This morning as I read the newspaper headlines, I thought I might have finally found an issue on which I could agree with the President!! But after about an hour of thinking about it, I realized that once again, that even though he said something that I might agree with in principle, I would have trouble seeing it applied to our country.
So what was the statement? The President suggested that we need to lengthen the time that students are in school in an effort to help us catch-up with the rest of the industrialized world in education. I have thought about that issue in the past and I might agree that it would be a good idea IF the students were actually being taught lessons which would help them become better American citizens. Looking briefly at some recent news, do we really want our students to spend more time in their public school classrooms?
On the East coast that would give them more time to learn how to sing praises to President Obama! (NJ/NC) -- Imagine the backlash if that had happened under W's term.
Out on the Left coast students would have more time to learn about how wonderful Harvey Milk and his homosexual lifestyle were! (SB572) -- Imagine if the schools honored Ronald Reagan.
In Texas students would be able to study about all types of religious holidays -- except Christmas!! (Recent Texas textbook wants to delte Christmas -- but at the moment Texas isn't buying it!)
And from coast to coast, students would have more time to be warned to use condoms when engaging in homosexual acts (Obama's "safe school czar" Kevin Jennings)
Maybe the President and his Czars could suggest ways in which our children could learn to read and write (in English), learn math, and maybe even learn correct History. Then they could help us figure out ways to help students stay in school long enough to graduate.
But then that would mean they would actually have to develop some original thoughts!!
Tuesday, September 29, 2009
Monday, September 28, 2009
Bumpers Sticker of the Day and "Pop Quiz"!
This is amazing. Read this and think about it and before you get to the very bottom where you can see who it is, make a guess WHO IT IS before you check the identification. It might surprise you.I was born in one country, raised in another.
My father was born in another country.
I was not his only child. He fathered several children with numerous women.
I became very close to my mother, as my father showed no interest in me.
My mother died at an early age from cancer.
Later in life, questions arose over my real name.
My birth records were sketchy and no one was able to produce a legitimate, reliable birth certificate.
I grew up practicing one faith but converted to Christianity, as it was widely accepted in my country, but I practiced non-traditional beliefs and didn't follow Christianity, except in the public eye under scrutiny.
I worked and lived among lower-class people as a young adult, disguising myself as someone who really cared about them.
That was before I decided it was time to get serious about my life and I embarked on a new career.
I wrote a book about my struggles growing up. It was clear to those who read my memoirs that I had difficulties accepting that my father abandoned me as a child.
I became active in local politics in my 30's, then with help behind the scenes, I literally burst onto the scene as a candidate for national office in my 40s. They said I had a golden tongue and could talk anyone into anything. That reinforced my conceit.
I had a virtually non-existent resume, little work history, and no experience in leading a single organization. Yet I was a powerful speaker and citizens were drawn to me as though I were a magnet and they were small roofing tacks.
I drew incredibly large crowds during my public appearances. This bolstered my ego.
At first, my political campaign focused on my country's foreign policy. I was very critical of my country in the last war and seized every opportunity to bash my country.
But what launched my rise to national prominence were my views on the country's economy. I pretended to have a really good plan on how we could do better and every poor person would be fed and housed for free.
I knew which group was responsible for getting us into this mess. It was the free market, banks and corporations. I decided to start making citizens hate them and if they were envious of others who did well, the plan was clinched tight.
I was the surprise candidate because I emerged from outside the traditional path of politics and was able to gain widespread popular support.
I knew that, if I merely offered the people 'hope', together we could change our country and the world. So, I started to make my speeches sound like they were on behalf of the downtrodden, poor, ignorant to include "persecuted minorities". My true views were not widely known and I needed to keep them unknown, until after I became my nation's leader.
I had to carefully guard reality, as anybody could have easily found out what I really believed, if they had simply read my writings and examined those people I associated with. I'm glad they didn't.
Then I became the most powerful man in the world.
And the world learned the truth.
OK, now........... Who am I???
Actually, I want you to post your guess on my Facebook page. I'll give the answer and the source on Wednesday!!
Wednesday, September 23, 2009
Mainstream Media Meltdown?
It appears that mainstream media (MSM) continues to suffer financial problems. Could it be that the average American who can afford to purchase/watch MSM (and who can read English) are tired of MSM's sloppy job of reporting the news and holding our elected officials accountable? If Americans are interested in cheerleaders for the Democrats or Pres. Obama, they can easily check out their websites.
And it is not just that MSM refuses to perform their traditional roles as watchdogs and gatekeepers as they give the Obama administration an almost "free ride", but they also continue to ignore or degrade anyone who disagrees with Obama's unprecedented power grab. Can you imagine the barrels of printers ink that would have been used if Bush had appointed 40+ czars who are only accountable to the President and who spewed the hatred and venom which many of the Obama czars are famous for? Or what if a "right-wing" group had been caught suggesting 10% of the corruption that ACORN is now accused of? Would MSM have given Bush the "free ride" they are giving Obama (who worked with, and paid for services from, ACORN.
And what about the complete lack of coverage for the 9/12 Tea Party protests? The streets and the Mall of D.C. were packed with people, but no coverage from MSM or the Administration. You can call this "prophecy", but I predict that when 50,000 Muslims gather in D.C. this Friday to pray to Allah, the will get more press (and more support from the White House" than hundreds of thousands of American Patriots received on 9/12. Where your heart is .....
And locally, the Sun Newspaper sees itself as a cheerleader for the Mayor instead of holding him to some real standards. For example, when his opponent does something (oppose Operation Phoenix) that he has consistently done for years (in and out of campaign season) it is labeled as "politicking". But when the Mayor decides to send out birthday cards to voters a couple of months before the election (when he hasn't done this before) there is no mention of it in either the editorial column, news columns, or Letters to the Editor (and yes, letters were submitted).
So it should really come as no surprise that most of the MSM is suffering (except Fox News and Conservative talk radio). And it should come as no surprise that the Obama Administration is talking about a "bailout" for MSM. Why not, he can use taxpayer dollars to fund his "free" press. Much like Germany in the 30's!
And it is not just that MSM refuses to perform their traditional roles as watchdogs and gatekeepers as they give the Obama administration an almost "free ride", but they also continue to ignore or degrade anyone who disagrees with Obama's unprecedented power grab. Can you imagine the barrels of printers ink that would have been used if Bush had appointed 40+ czars who are only accountable to the President and who spewed the hatred and venom which many of the Obama czars are famous for? Or what if a "right-wing" group had been caught suggesting 10% of the corruption that ACORN is now accused of? Would MSM have given Bush the "free ride" they are giving Obama (who worked with, and paid for services from, ACORN.
And what about the complete lack of coverage for the 9/12 Tea Party protests? The streets and the Mall of D.C. were packed with people, but no coverage from MSM or the Administration. You can call this "prophecy", but I predict that when 50,000 Muslims gather in D.C. this Friday to pray to Allah, the will get more press (and more support from the White House" than hundreds of thousands of American Patriots received on 9/12. Where your heart is .....
And locally, the Sun Newspaper sees itself as a cheerleader for the Mayor instead of holding him to some real standards. For example, when his opponent does something (oppose Operation Phoenix) that he has consistently done for years (in and out of campaign season) it is labeled as "politicking". But when the Mayor decides to send out birthday cards to voters a couple of months before the election (when he hasn't done this before) there is no mention of it in either the editorial column, news columns, or Letters to the Editor (and yes, letters were submitted).
So it should really come as no surprise that most of the MSM is suffering (except Fox News and Conservative talk radio). And it should come as no surprise that the Obama Administration is talking about a "bailout" for MSM. Why not, he can use taxpayer dollars to fund his "free" press. Much like Germany in the 30's!
Sunday, September 13, 2009

Hey Mr. President -- The truth can hurt!! If you don't like being called a liar -- then stop the lies! Hey Democrats -- Why are yo so bent out of shape? You spent 8 years saying that President Bush "lied", but you always did it through the media and behind his back. At least Rep. Wilson said it in person!!
Saturday, September 12, 2009
Who will set the Health Care Standards?
While listening to much of this health care debate, something has dawned on me that no one appears to be addressing. If some form of government "run" health care legislation is passed, who will set the standards for various components of health care. For instance, most people say that the government will determine "how much/what type" of health care is good for you and your family. Much like the current auto insurance, there will be minimum levels of acceptable insurance. And if you don't want to carry that much, you will be fined by the government (much like receiving a ticket for not having appropriate car insurance).
But who will determine appropriate fitness levels for Americans? And who will determine if you don't measure up to these levels, what your "fine"will be (extra taxes, less health care, fewer options, etc.). This type of decision is very subjective and open to massive abuse. For instance, those that know me would not say that I am skinny, but I don't think any would label me as overly obese. Yet by many of the current height/weight standards published by various governmental/insurance groups, that is exactly what I am. Even though my cholesterol, blood pressure, pulse, sugars, etc, are fine, the so-called experts say I am unhealthy.
And last week the paper carried an article about the President's Council on Physical Fitness and Sports. According to the article, a healthy 40-year-old should be able to 40 push ups, 65 "half sit-ups" in 1 minute, and run 1.5 miles in under 10 minutes!! (That is under a 7 minute mile.) By comparison, 20 year olds in the Air Force Para Rescue forces have an easier physical test!! Now I believe that I am in better shape than the majority of 40 year olds, but theses are pretty tough standards. Who will decide that if I can't measure up, then maybe I don't deserve to get medical treatment since I am "unfit".
We need to stop our government from taking even more of our freedoms and imposing some "Brave New World" requirements on us. For those pressuring us to adopt and expansion of government control in health care, can you please name me one government run program that has accomplished what it started out to do and came in close to on par with their projected expenses?
But who will determine appropriate fitness levels for Americans? And who will determine if you don't measure up to these levels, what your "fine"will be (extra taxes, less health care, fewer options, etc.). This type of decision is very subjective and open to massive abuse. For instance, those that know me would not say that I am skinny, but I don't think any would label me as overly obese. Yet by many of the current height/weight standards published by various governmental/insurance groups, that is exactly what I am. Even though my cholesterol, blood pressure, pulse, sugars, etc, are fine, the so-called experts say I am unhealthy.
And last week the paper carried an article about the President's Council on Physical Fitness and Sports. According to the article, a healthy 40-year-old should be able to 40 push ups, 65 "half sit-ups" in 1 minute, and run 1.5 miles in under 10 minutes!! (That is under a 7 minute mile.) By comparison, 20 year olds in the Air Force Para Rescue forces have an easier physical test!! Now I believe that I am in better shape than the majority of 40 year olds, but theses are pretty tough standards. Who will decide that if I can't measure up, then maybe I don't deserve to get medical treatment since I am "unfit".
We need to stop our government from taking even more of our freedoms and imposing some "Brave New World" requirements on us. For those pressuring us to adopt and expansion of government control in health care, can you please name me one government run program that has accomplished what it started out to do and came in close to on par with their projected expenses?
Monday, September 7, 2009
Happy Birthday from the Mayor!!
Mayor Morris,
Are you really stooping that low to send out birthday cards from you and your wife wishing voters a "Happy Birthday" with only 2 months left until the election? And you just started this? Who are you trying to fool? And it sure is a nice touch when the person lives in a ward where one of your "Gang of Four" is running for re-election -- "Councilman Dennis Baxter told me it was your birthday." What a crock!! You got the birthday info from the ROV -- just like any other candidate!! If you were really serious about buying votes with birthday cards, you should have included a birthday gift -- but not a bribe!
Are you really stooping that low to send out birthday cards from you and your wife wishing voters a "Happy Birthday" with only 2 months left until the election? And you just started this? Who are you trying to fool? And it sure is a nice touch when the person lives in a ward where one of your "Gang of Four" is running for re-election -- "Councilman Dennis Baxter told me it was your birthday." What a crock!! You got the birthday info from the ROV -- just like any other candidate!! If you were really serious about buying votes with birthday cards, you should have included a birthday gift -- but not a bribe!
Baca's Taxpayer Funded Campaign Flier
Like most voters in the 43rd, I received my taxpayer funded campaign newsleter from Congressman Baca this week. It is interesting that during the month of August he couldn't find time to meet with his constituents, but he had time to spend our money to tell us all of the wonderful stuff he "did" for us.
But Mr. Baca, you try to credit the Obama/Democrat stimuls plan for getting money for the 215 freeway widening. Correct me if I am wrong, but wasn't that project started well before the so-called stimulus bill was voted on? And where exactly are the 8,000 new jobs that were created on the 215 project. I drive that road almost every day and I haven't seen anywhere close to 8,000 NEW workers.
And where are the 52,000 new and saved jobs that you said would be a result of the "stimulus"? Last time I checked, unemployment has risen since the "stimulus" and in the Inland Empire it is now around 15%. With a little more "stimulus" from you guys, we might actually reach Depression Era unemployment!! Thanks for the help. It seems that about the only place that the Obama plan has stimulated is government jobs and Czars who hate America.
It is also interesting to note that under your "Pork" Spending section, that 42% (6 out of 14) of your pork projects were done in conjunction with other House Members. And of the $83+ million dollars of pork, over $70 million came with the help of these other house members. And $35,000,000 went towards textbooks and supplies that probably went all across the country and very little came to the 43rd. So you like to brag about "bringing home the money" and yet you seem to be able to bring home very little by yourself and about 1/2 of it didn't even come to our district. Thanks for the help in wasting our tax dollars!
But Mr. Baca, you try to credit the Obama/Democrat stimuls plan for getting money for the 215 freeway widening. Correct me if I am wrong, but wasn't that project started well before the so-called stimulus bill was voted on? And where exactly are the 8,000 new jobs that were created on the 215 project. I drive that road almost every day and I haven't seen anywhere close to 8,000 NEW workers.
And where are the 52,000 new and saved jobs that you said would be a result of the "stimulus"? Last time I checked, unemployment has risen since the "stimulus" and in the Inland Empire it is now around 15%. With a little more "stimulus" from you guys, we might actually reach Depression Era unemployment!! Thanks for the help. It seems that about the only place that the Obama plan has stimulated is government jobs and Czars who hate America.
It is also interesting to note that under your "Pork" Spending section, that 42% (6 out of 14) of your pork projects were done in conjunction with other House Members. And of the $83+ million dollars of pork, over $70 million came with the help of these other house members. And $35,000,000 went towards textbooks and supplies that probably went all across the country and very little came to the 43rd. So you like to brag about "bringing home the money" and yet you seem to be able to bring home very little by yourself and about 1/2 of it didn't even come to our district. Thanks for the help in wasting our tax dollars!
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
